Entries in twitter (5)

Monday
Oct122009

Small Businesses & Social Media: Many Missing in Action?

 

A recent Reuters release, Small business, social media not mixing caught my eye. The release highlighted a survey of small businesses conducted by Citibank Small Business with the somewhat surprising finding:

Three-quarters of small businesses say they have not found sites such Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn helpful for generating business leads or expanding business in the past year.”

On the face of it, this seems to fly in the face of several studies showing the tremendous impact of social media. Three studies, using online marketing tools used often by small business, come to mind:

1. Paid search

A recent study published by GroupM Search and comScore. showed that consumer’s exposed to a brand’s social media when combined with  paid search programs are 2.8 times more likely to search for the brand’s products when compared to users who only saw paid seach.

2. Blogs

 A HubSpot study of 795 small–to-medium sized businesses that blog found that the average “blogging” small company  gets 55%  more visitors.  Although not addressed in that study, considering that Twitter is micro-blogging,  one would expect it to raise a small business’ web traffic as well.  And certainly  some reports  (eg. O'Reilly's  “Twitter Drives Traffic, Sales”  indicate that it does.

3. Email Marketing

A study by Silverpop, found that combining social networking with email as well can be very powerful. Looking at email marketing reach of emails which included links to Facebook, MySpace and Twitter,  the study found

....shared emails evaluated for the study delivered an average increase in reach of 24.3 percent (based on original emails delivered), and this figure is expected to increase exponentially once sharing becomes mainstream.



Small Biz SocialMedia Wunderkin are Outliers?

 

You don’t have to go very deep into the social bookmarking sites, to find many fine super-list collections of small business case studies describing spectacular results from social media. Some of the better known include:

52Teas, an online tea e-tail site

CPA for Small Business

Coffee Grounds, a Houston coffee shop

 Kogi Taco Truck

Or check out Jason’s Fall’s recent roundup of small business case studies

Are these well-known small business case studies startling exceptions?  Are they the cherry-picked, well-trained poster children of the Marketing Elite, selling their Social Media Kool-Aid?

Well - as all technology bubbles are prone to encompass a greater sphere of influence than reality can measure, so too with small businesses and social media.

 

Why Would a Small Business Not be Benefiting from Social Media?

Why would small businesses report  finding little business advantage to using social media, given the remarkably positive results of the above studies?

Certainly, my own experience  with small companies is that they often do not have the resources to blog, Twitter or set up multiple presences on social networks. This in itself is no profound or new insight. The  HubSpot study mentioned that  a considerable number of the small businesses they sampled do NOT blog (nearly half of their total sample, or 736 companies, did not ).  But cultivating a blog is a well-known social media tactic for fully using Twitter and other social networks as a distribution mechanism. (Okay- now we are starting to get somewhere in understanding this...)

Many Small Businesses are Actually Living in Web 1.5

Following this line of thought, there are two simple explanations for the disparity:  First, in line with the fact that only 50% are blogging, many small businesses have unfortunately, not caught up with even the first generation of Web 2.0 tools to leverage the newer social networks and social media tools. 

Many Small Businesses do not understand Social Media integrates with All the Assets within their Current Online Marketing Strategy.

Second, and I believe more important, it may be that many small businesses are not  properly integrating their social media use into their other online marketing activities.

If there is anything we are learning about social media tools and social networks, it’s that they are  not stand-alone devices.  Rather, they are best used when combined in concert with other online marketing  tools and , certainly, when integrated into an overall online marketing strategy.  As the paid search and Silverpop email studies demonstrated well, the effectiveness of these well-known online tools is magnified by their co-use with social media.

Perhaps, stepping quietly and timidly into these tools, many small businesses are not aware of the synergies inherent to social media use:  Social bookmarking, blogging, participation and co-linking across multiple social networks are well-known to exert a compounding effect on a company's brand.

Are small businesses failing at the strategy level, i.e. not setting a social marketing plan in place?  Or are they failing at the tactical execution level, i.e. not integrating their online marketing tools properly?

They Can't Listen when They Aren't There

The answer may lie in the other intriguing statistic uncovered by the CitiBank study, namely,

86% [ of small businesses surveyed] said they have not used social networking sites for information or business advice.

 Wow! There's part of our answer.

If  the small company executives can’t find their way to the experts, surely, they cannot find good guidance to proper use of the technology, including the large cultural shift we are learning is part of the social media experience.

 A very self-fulfilling prophesy indeed!

Your thoughts?  (I'd  especially love to hear from you small businesses that have ventured into social media.)

 

 

Bookmark and Share

 

 

Monday
Jul062009

What if The Beatles and The Pope Used Twitter on the Same Day?

Posted on Tuesday, July 7, 2009 10:00 PM EST

Admittedly, that's an absurdist title. But, as I'll show, perhaps not so absurdist given recent postings on Twitter.

Believe me. I am a great fan of Twitter: I'm as ardent an advocate, passionista, social media evangelista as nary can be found in the Southeastern United States. I carefully curate my small Twitter feed. I endeavor to keep a pretty high S/N ratio of information flow. I promote Twitter as a highly-effective low-cost new media channel to clients. Why I don't even attach much credence to recent forecasts that Facebook (through its continuous "Follow Twitter's development path" updates) ultimately prevails over Twitter.

But something, well, specifically four tweets and their associated blog postings, struck me as a bit odd yesterday.

Mind you, not one of these postings alone seen on separate days would capture my extended attention. However, that all of them occurred within the same 24-hour period definitely captured the cross-correlators within my pattern recognition system.

It all started with the subject of a Friendfeed posting yesterday....

What If the Beatles Used Twitter?

This somewhat whimsical blog post of course asserted that The Beatles would have doubled their professional and personal fortune if they had been able to mirror their lives on the Net, much as celebrities MC Hammer [1 Mn+ followers] and @britneyspears [2.28 M followers] do today.

Okay- I'll buy that argument: Twitter access would have made Beatlemania larger than The Sloan Great Wall. (Hint: largest known physical structure in the Universe). Sure.

While still ruminating on that, oddly enough, I encounter a tweet leading me to...

What If the Buddha Used Twitter...

 

A thought-provoking, sometimes profound and definitely charming piece, Soren Gordhamer's article in yesterday's Huffington Post focuses on how the key figure in Buddhism would use Twitter. For instance, he writes...

 

Better than a thousand senseless verses is one that brings the hearer peace. -- The Buddha

The second [approach] is that the quality of our tweets matter much more than the quantity of them. One meaningful tweet a day is much better than posting numerous tweets that do not add value to the world. Of course, what "adds value" can be debated. There are a lot of silly tweets and links to videos that bring smiles to millions of people. Tweets do not have to be serious, but I think the Buddha would say that the real mission of life is not to produce large quantities of anything, including tweets, but it is instead to make a positive impact. One tweet that does that is better than a million that do not.

Yes, I thought, this too all rings true. And in fact Soren's observation is a great palliative against some of the depressing scores some of us get from the Twitter grader/scorer algorithms. To be ranked a "Great Tweeter", many of these programs insist you tweet with the frequency and ferocity of @cnnbrk (CNN Breaking News).

Perhaps Soren's observation even makes us look a bit more sympathetically at the AdAge twitter lashing that some marquis name ad agencies took yesterday --- for not tweeting enough or properly. (With some 8000+ bit.ly click-throughs to the original article link so far, there's clearly a swarm of on-lookers to watch old media get bashed for not being cool enough to fully and quickly enough imbibe their social media juice.)

Here I think: Hmm..Buddha should know. Even at the most conservative estimates, there are some 300 Mn to 1.3 Bn Buddhist followers worldwide. Compare that to Twitter's 10-20 Mn followers (loosely correcting the Comscore estimates against the 60% "Qwitter" factor from the A.C. Nielsen study. (Luckily, Twitter isn't competing with Buddhism for venture capital...)

Some hours later... I stumble upon a tweet from the intellectual Utne Reader, informing me...

Okay- this is getting big. The Beatles.  The Buddha.  The Pope.   How many marquis name co-brandings can be out there in one day alone? (Okay- I'm stretching the papal reference i know...)

What possible other illustrious groups can we associate the brand name Twitter with?

Surely, there are no higher authorities -- after all this is one 24-hour timeframe here, folks.

Well, rock my K.D. Payne sentiment analyzers, folks, if there wasn't one more in the daily queue...

Twitter Suggested for Nobel Prize

 

By the end of the day, no less than the Silicon Valley Business Journal confides that "Twitter Suggested for Nobel Prize". That's right, Mark Pfeile, a former Deputy National Security Advisor for the Bush administration, is apparently nominating Twitter for the Nobel Peace Prize. True enough- with foreign journalists and media thrown out of Iran, Twitter provided oft times the only window to the world to follow the post-election Iranian situation.

As The Christian Monitor put it,  "... in the past month, 140 characters were enough to shine a light on Iranian oppression and elevate Twitter to the level of change agent."

Most remarkably, Twitter's SMS news service included the participation of more technically-inclined Twitterers (eg. John Perry Barlow and the EFF) who aided in getting the news out of Iran via proxy servers. This provided us with a humanity-bonding linkage to news events that the world had not previously experienced before.  (So I hope it's clear: It is not at all my position to dispute that Twitter deserves a Nobel Peace Prize.)

What Then is the Point of All This?

 

My point here is simply that such a 24-hour tweet roundup of Twitter associations with some of the world's mega luminaries has me feeling --well-- just a bit of woozy "story stock" sickness.

It's as though someone were trying to pry my jaws open to swallow a 15-course meal including oysters rockefeller, roast duck, foie gras pate and baked trufled brie en croute - all down my gullet in one swallow. Frankly - it's feeling March 2000-ish (the period immediately preceding the dotcom bomb where new e-commerce stock valuations were running their highest).

Now what's particularly a little uneasy-making is that any one of the these stories has merit. But the gestalt of their conjoint appearance, while not arousing suspicion of a strategic PR initiative, at least makes one think that some of this confabulation is encouraged. Perhaps it provides a "psychic PR bridge" for Twitter investors, a much-needed bridge until the much-awaited hard-nosed monetization model appears.

To me, Twitter is a fabulous technology. But that doesn't mean it needs confabulation.

What do you think?

Is Twitter over-hyped? Do these articles centering on "What if [INSERT FAMOUS NAME HERE] Used Twitter" enlighten or obscure?

 

 

 

Bookmark and Share

 

 

Saturday
Mar142009

Twelve Fab Twitter Reads for Newbies

Okay, for the past couple of weeks now, I've done a bit of scrambling, poking, stumbling and head plants around on Twitter. While still cracking the egg to emerge to the next stage, I thought other new Twitterers would find some of these sites useful. (Note these are ordered in rough order of approachability.)   Source

1. TwitterTips Beginner's Guide: 10 Quick & Easy Steps to getting started. There's no faster way to get up and running than via this well-crafted guide. Daily following of @TwitterTips and @Twitips is highly recommended.

 

2. Ten Twitter Tips to Get you to the Top

Far beyond mastery ofthe mechanicals (commands and syntax), the tricky part for many is understanding how Twitter rewards openness, honesty and transparency. NerdwithSwag.com's worthy posting helps move you into the right twittertude to "get this", avoiding some embarassing gaffs.

 

3. TwipTips: Top Ten Niche Twitter User Lists

Updated regularly, this list covers the top ten people all Twitter beginners should be following as well as those in various niches, from finance to journalism to gardening.

 

4. Learning or Teaching Twitter Yourself: A Teacher's Guide

Who better to learn Twitter from than teachers?

 

5. Renegade ProBlog's Twitter Training Videos

I'm not into MLM like these folks, but if you are seeking a moderate pace and a free training video that leads you mouseclick by mouseclick, this is it.

 

6. Craving a Book on Twitter?

Check out pre-ordering Twitter for Dummies by Laura Fitton, Michael Gruen and Leslie Poston. (According to Amazon's website, it'ns not due out until Augusut 2009).

 

7. Ten Twitter Tools that Help you Work Smarter

Twitip's exceedingly popular and updated reference covers everything from ping.fm (broadcasting your tweets to other social networks like Facebook, MySpace, etc.) to Twittertools (integrating your tweets into your WordPress blog) to Tweetburner (see how popular your tweets are) to Quitter (helping you undestand when and why people stop following you.)

 

8. Twitter Fan Wiki

A comprehensive list of twitter apps, covering PC and Mac desktops to web apps.

 

9. TechCrunch's Top 21 Twitter Applications (according to Compete)

Want to know which particular apps are catching on? Based on data from Compete, TechCrunch tracked the top 21.

 

10. Tweetstats: Top Ten Twitter Applications of the Day

Hungry for more frequent updates? With an estimated 10-15 new Twitter apps being put out to market per day, you might want to check Tweetstats close-to-realtime watch where you can find the identities of the most popular apps as well as new and lesser known ones.

 

 

For recommended reading that speaks more to the fabric of Twitter, exploring some of its unique qualities and why it's addictive...

 

 

 

 

Source

 

11. Does Social Media Make Us Better, Happier, Nicer People?       From Tony Hsieh of Zappos and Pete Cashmore of Mashable, these two articles consider how Twitter and other social media tools are changing the way we act.

 

12. PR 2.0: In the Statusphere, A.D.D. Creates Opportunities for Collaboration and Education

Brian Solis' article will move you up a few log units on the Twitter learning curve, capturing most eloquently the essence of good Twitter usage.

It's the art of curation. Producing and posting updates that people find invigorating, insightful, entertaining, and enriching is how you build a meaningful foundation for which people to follow, admire, and trust you. You are a beacon for all that moves you.

Remember, the secret to attracting comments,
likes or stimulating retweets is not governed by a formula, but instead by the intent and nature of sharing something worthy of response

The article goes on to explore Twitter in relation to other social media environments and tools like Google Search, giving new users some glimmer of what might happen next.

 

Please feel free to comment on any critical resources for Newbies I might have missed.

 

Related posts

Twitter: On Emerging Business Case Studies & Participatory Marketing

Skittles Skuttles Static Web Marketing

 

 

 

Bookmark and Share

Tuesday
Mar032009

Skittles Skuttles Static Web Marketing

 

Wordlet of 100 tweets from Skittles.com, March 3, 2009

Taking a clue from twitter.zappos.com, and a March 2008 Modernista campaign, on Thursday, Mars Snackfood, maker of Skittles candy, redefined its home page, skittles.com, to contain the ongoing chatter of any Twitter remark containing the word "Skittles" in it.

Heralded as a bold high-risk marketing move, the Skittles website now has minimal company-controlled branding messages (too little say some), focusing on user-created contents of the Twitters and video posters.

Designed to appeal to its mostly teenage audience, the marketing results are shaking up the online advertising world. As described in today's WSJ piece,

The Skittles.com site doesn't usually generate much traffic. In January, Skittles.com attracted 20,000 unique U.S. visitors, according to comScore.

However, as the initial data from Buzzmetrics published in WSJ shows, the initial market results are phenomenal.

Adage.comhas pointed out this morning that Skittle's Facebook site is cooking with new friends, some 582,604 as of 11 am today. By noon (the posting of this article), Skittle's Facebook friends numbered 584,886, in other words, up more than 2000 in roughly an hour or so.

To quote Freddie Laker from today's AdAge article,

The reality is, Skittles has done this completely right. This solution was quick to produce, leverages existing communities that have great interest in the product and creates a platform that further engages the consumer. I would recommend any brand with minimal budget and the right kind of audience drop the brand sites they currently have, which I'm guessing aren't terribly effective.

For companies targetting a young demographic target and a minimal budget, the Skittles campaign is worthy of study.

Wednesday
Feb252009

Twitter: On Emerging Business Case Studies & Participatory Marketing

Posted 2.25.08. What's hotter than genome dating, celebrity sitings or cool nanotech muppet videos from UC Berkeley? It's Twitter, the latest social media tool redefining the marketing landscape. In case you haven't read CNN. the WSJ or NY Times lately, Twitter is a "social networking and micro-blogging service that allows its users to send and read other user's updates (known as "tweets"), text-based posts of up to 140 characters in length". (Courtesy of Wikipedia)

A brand building network? A public relations device? A market research tool? Twitter is all of these.

Inspired by Sarah Milstein's recent article in O'Reilly's Radar compiling business case studies backing Twitter's application to real business, I set out to find not only what hard-nosed data existed, but also under what conditions it seemed to be working.

To start, if you're dubious on the value of Web 2.0 tools as the preferred new platform for corporate communication, you might want to check out the McKinsey Quarterly's Six New Ways to Make Web 2.0 Work. (Perhaps even more telling, check out how much time McKinsey itself is spending on Twitter...). You might also note that as of Feb 20th, the Obama administration put out an OMB announcement mandating the use of RSS feeds to report the uses of the money by takers. (Much cheaper than a SOX implementation, but more on this later....) And as to Twitter, an indicator of its rich green field opportunity is the estimated 10-15 Twitter apps that are put on the shelf daily.

So what data exists that Twitter is having a significant effect on conventional business metrics- items like revenue, web traffic and brand-building measures? Where do we see results and how is that happening? What are the mechanisms? Does Twitter per se achieve results or isn't it interacting with pre-existing core assets of the company?

Case Study 1.  Dell Computer's $1 Million in Twitter-associated Revenue

What first caught people's attention was a Fall 2008 announcement by Dell's Bob Pearson, VP of Communities and Conversations,  that the company credits Twitter sales alerts with over $1 Mn in incremental revenue. Dell's Twitter followers receive messages when discounted products are at the company's Home Outlet Store where they can click over to purchase the product or forward the information to others. Beyond coupons, Dell also credits that they have successfully identified and acted upon customer concerns up to three weeks earlier than previously, thanks to blog and social media commentary.

For a full discussion of Dell's social media strategy, check out  Forrester Research's interview, where we found this nice video interview.

Case Study 2  Twitter.Zappos.Com: When Every Employee Becomes a Customer Service Rep

Perhaps one of the most superb busness uses of Twitter is exemplified by Zappos, the Amazonian style e-commerce company stocking over 3 million shoes, handbags, clothing item and accessories from over 1100 brands.

The 24-year old CEO Tony Hsieh, not only twitters himself (with some 140,500 followers), but has encouraged its Zappos' employees to twitter, as can be seen on their twitter.zappos.com web page.

 

Zappos now claims it is twittering with over 9 million customers, or 3% of the U.S. population. The company;s efforts with social media networking before the public eye, including blogs, Zappos.TV, Facebook and Twitter have resulted in over $1 Bn in sales, 75% of which are from repeat customers.

 

Now it shouldn't be surprising that a CEO who sold LinkExchange to Microsoft for $270 Mn should grasp the importance of driving web traffic through well-placed self-linking in public conversations. A web page like twitter.zappos.com is worthy of study as the "secret sauce": It drives inbound links, its employees create a good deal of internal web links -- all magnets for search engine activity, in particular, raising Google Page Rank.

But as much as Zappos spectacular results have surely been enabled by Twitter, it should be pointed out that Zappos, like Dell, is delivering on some mighty good customer service offers in those tweets. The company offers free shipping both ways, has a 365-day return policy nad supports a call center that's always open. Then there's outrageously wonderful benefit that Zappos randomly bestows free upgrades to customers.

So those believing that Twitter per se is a magic technology bullet are over-simplifying: Twitter can clearly magnify great customer service, but the offers, the compelling content, still need to be there to fully experience the full magnification of this great new social lens.

Will large companies get the ramifications of Tony Hsieh's battle cry "Customer service is a branding opportunity?" The twitter.zappos.com page is a mash-up: It's not only a customer service forum, it's a public relations, branding and search engine attraction platform. Companies that continue to view these functions as separate corporate silos aren't going to "get it".

For companies new to Twitter, it's time well spent to view Tony Hsieh's slideware show on exposing your company as much as possible with Web 2.0 tools. (Inspired? Zappo's Quick Start Guide provides a highly approachable description of how to begin.

Case Study 3   Early Twitter Advertisers Get Subscriber Count Windfall

Another great example of the new green field opportunities offered by Twitter was described in a recent LA Times piece covering the impact of Twitter's new "suggested users" feature. To help new users get started, Twitter began offering this feature, a link list of showcased websites and personalities. Putting aside the fact that this new feature did arouse some protestations, the latent power of Twitter advertising was revealed in the traffic counts of the beneficiary companies. Per TwitterCounter, TechCrunch, already one of the internet's most popular tech blogs, jumped from 41,000 to 111,000 Twitter followers in one month while the Guardian's technology page jumped from 4000 followers to 66,000. (It's doubled this already.) According to the LA Times piece, @GuardianTech added new users at a pace 300% faster than the previous two weeks and The New York Times Twitter account increased its subscriber base by a factor of six - to 145,000.

Case Study 4: Gary Vaynerchuk: Personality + Wine + Web 2.0 Tools = Twitter Force

Following on the Dell-Zappos theme that it takes more than a social media tool per se to make a good business use of it, let's look at Gary Vaynerchuk and Wine LibraryTV.

First, it's important to realise that well before the advent of Twitter, Vaynerchuk had already brought up his family's wine business from $4.5 Mn in sales to $45 Mn. Today, Veynerchuk hosts 38,000 followers. More significantly, he is beginning to monetize his Twitter and other social media use, striking a deal with Revision 3 whih is producing 3 minute segments of Wine LibraryTV.

While Gary's Keynotes  ar well worthy of watching to understand his approach, his Feb 19 video post really captures best who he is and attitude toward traditional media and new media. (Do watch it: he video comments back to Twitter posters.)

What are the operating rules that have made Wine LibraryTV such a social media phenom? Even though this is a near one-man show, there are 4 rules that Vaynerchuk goes by that we believe translate up to corporate use of Twitter. (Most of these have been abstracted from Gary's videos. He's writing a book on social media, in case i did'nt quite get these right..)

Rule 1. Use the Social Media Tools, All the Tools.

Arriving at Tumblr-driven GaryVayNerChuk.com, it's clear what's part of the secret sauce accompanying Vaynerchuk's wine. There's just a plethora of social media tools, applications and widgets here. Seemingly, every bit as much as Steve Rubel's Micropersuasion or Scobleizer, both of whom make a business of social media per se.

Rule 2. Offer "Free-mium". Pour It On Generously.

In one of his keynote addresses, Gary explains that he's a great believer in "free-mium", namely, giving away stuff for free. But what stuff? The viral hook that keeps Gary's followers hooked is sure, the guy knows tons about wine and enthusiastically shares it, but he's also a great source of tracking and knowing about the latest social media tools. In other words, if you follow Gary, you know where the new hot channel and tools are - whether it's Twitter, Tumblr or probably something new next week.

Rule 3. Be Completely Transparent.

Observing Wine LibraryTV, one is struck by the intense blend and merging of personality, product and media. This stems from Vaynerchuk's philosophy of imbuing his brand DNA into his products and services. After all, the product idea came from you - it's your inner child. Twitter and web video just expose your inner child publicly. Transparency, and with that comes authenticity and honesty, is part of the juice behind people's attraction to these tools. And part of being transparent means you let the rough edges show. When Gary's Cork'd  blog got hacked, he was open about it, getting interviewed in TechCrunch's coverage of the story. And in the end, he ends up looking all the more human for it.

(Sidenote: It is also the transparency factor that drove the Obama administration's use of RSS feeds as a mandate to taking stimulus money. If everybody can watch the Stimulus Money RSS channel, we all know where the money's going.)

Rule 4. "Don't Listen to Anybody, Listen to Everybody" (Gary Vaynerchuk)

There areat least two meanings behind this great quote. First and obvous, it's clear that savvy business people do watch what people are twittering about their company. In fact, there's probably no faster way to convert executive management to Twitter than to take them to seach.twitter.com and type in the company name.

Second meaning. It's impossible (especially if your real business is selling wine or shoes) to stay up on all the social media tools real-time, but if you've added value to your followers, among those "followers" are "leaders", people who have tools, insights and news relevant to your business to share with you. This is the true genius of Twitter business use: Even the smallest of compaies can have 10,000 low-overhead marketing and customer service evangelists.

Other Great Examples?

There are many other profoundly great examples of Twitter use contributing to real business results.

  • Ushering in a new era of fundraising, Pistachio Consulting's combined use of Twitter and micro-lending to raise $25,000 for a nonprofit called charity:water URL. In four day, @wellwishes had raised $5000 among its Twitter followers. It also earned Pistachio and Laura Fitton a mention on HuffPo.
  • Combining Twitter with a contest, domain registrar NameCheap raised web traffic 10% in December, resulting in a 20% increase in sold domain registrations.
  • Then there's a host of small business case studies emerging.

 

Take Away Lessons

Lesson 1. Judging from Dell and Zappos, there's good support for the first of six factors identified inMcKinsey's Six Factors Behind Using Web 2.0, namely, "The transformation to a bottom-up culture needs help from the top". Executive management not only sets precedent for behavior, it provides best practice examples of how to use the tools with customer, the public and others.

Lesson 2. The Dell and Zappos case studies also support McKinsey's factor, "What's in the Workflow Gets Used". These organizations have embedded Twitter use into their customer service operations with compelling results.

Lesson 3. Effective use of participatory technology leverages not just "cognitive surplus" or the untapped potential from employees, but from customers and partners as well. Wine LibraryTV's deal with Revision 3 as well as "free-ium" cool tool trading with outsiders illustrates this well.

Lesson 4. Companies with great brands adopt the latest brand-expanding technologies early. This is perhaps the greatest lession of the Twitter business success stories: It is no longer sufficient to have a great brand inside your industry, companies have to be seen as technology leaders, specifically adopting the latest brand communication channels. And today that channel is Twitter.

Ironically, a great number of highly sophisticated tech companies must be realizing at this point that the marketing benefits of Web 2.0 are being best leveraged by a shoe company and an alcoholic beverages supplier.

In the end, the trick to social media tools is no trick at all: Twitter just happens to be the latest green field marketing channel. There are many more new social media channels to come. As Gary V might say, you have to be ready to sample them, swirl and savor them in your mouth (perhaps biting a few rocks and pebbles along the way), and then spit the whole thing out with a ferocious force.

For companies that can't ascend to recognizing that marketing has become 360 degrees of mass participation? To paraphrase Francis Fukayama from "Are We Approaching the End of History?", there's the danger of being "still in history", the equivalent of being left behind after the Rapture, where everyone else will have already transcended to a celestial "participatory marketing" plane.

Bookmark and Share